Well, it's a 2-step process: they adjust the hardware controls on the display to get all the usual parameters set as closely as possible, including individual R-G-B settings, then the software (Light Illusion or Calman) generates a LUT that can be used with an external device to get the monitor the rest of the way, usually with certain colors that are a little bit off. I appreciate it.Ĭlayton Von Isaacs wrote:So what your saying is that with Calman you are adjusting the monitor on the monitor and not creating an LUT that Resolve sends out to the monitor so that the LUT setting sent from the computer make the monitor look correct? Thanks again for taking the time out of your busy day to help with your insight on this. And my issue was since Mac and Windows see color differently, if it was an LUT then the translation would be screwed up on the Mac. So what your saying is that with Calman you are adjusting the monitor on the monitor and not creating an LUT that Resolve sends out to the monitor so that the LUT setting sent from the computer make the monitor look correct? I have used color calibration programs and monkey before, but they always created a LUT that you set the computer system to use to send to the monitor to look correct, and you did not mess with the settings on the monitor. I was hoping you would answer here but I did not want to pester you with a private message directly as I know you are a busy guy. If the monitor is set correctly, then it should be right regardless of input, assuming it comes in digitally and in the same color space (presumably Rec709). It doesn't matter as long as the monitor comes out right.Īll of them are using self-contained systems that don't rely on the test signals within Resolve. But I would bet many (if not most) Resolve users in the area are using Mac, with a lot of pro users on Linux. Marc Wielage wrote:The calibration guys I know in LA use very cheap (like $300-$400) Windows laptops and Calman with Klein K-10A colorimeters. You still be able to connect through the network in the specified port. Running Thunderbolt 2 out that mac to BM Ultra Studio 4K Extreme, then HDMI 2.0 to LG OLED55B6P 55" Ultra High Def 4K (again panel was tested and considered a reference monitor)How about running either software on Parallels or similar emulator. My system, 12 core 2.7 Ghz Mac Pro Late 2013 running OS Sierra (Dual D700 cards and 128 gigs of ram). It just really seems weird that many artists use Mac mostly and yet there is no option for it. Even if I were to do the above Mac sees color differently from windows. I know there are others that do the computer monitor, but I am looking at calibrating myUHD monitor which has been tested as a reference monitor. Since many post houses are Linux or Mac, are there any reliable color calibration software/hardware programs that you can use to calibrate a 4K UHD monitor like the two programs above do and run on a mac. I contacted both vendors and CalMan is Windows 7 only (which you can't even get anymore) and LightSpace emailed back "As per the information on our website LightSpace CMS is Windows only. However, both programs mandate you have to use a windows computer. Running Thunderbolt 2 out that mac to BM Ultra Studio 4K Extreme, then HDMI 2.0 to LG OLED55B6P 55" Ultra High Def 4K (again panel was tested and considered a reference monitor)Ĭlayton Von Isaacs wrote:So Resolve has built in support for CalMan and LightSpace. I really do not want to partition run boot camp or VM and windows just to do this what should be simple ting. The alternative option is to run it on a low-cost Windows laptop, networked It will run on Mac under any form of Windows emulation. "As per the information on our website LightSpace CMS is Windows only. I contacted both vendors and CalMan Sales guy said it runs on Windows 7 only (which you can't even get anymore) and LightSpace emailed back: So Resolve has built in support for CalMan and LightSpace.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |